Differences in Malnutrition Inflammation Score of Hemodialysis Patients Associated With Hemodialysis Factors. A Spanish Multicenter Epidemiologic Study.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study are to analyze the prevalence of malnutrition in hemodialysis (HD) patients in Spain, and to assess the association of malnutrition in these patients with sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidity, and parameters related to HD. DESIGN AND METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional study in HD patients from centers all over Spain was conducted. Nutritional status of patients was assessed using Malnutrition Inflammation Score (MIS), and was stratified according to MIS values into 5 categories: ≤2, normal nutrition; >2 to ≤5, mild malnutrition or risk of malnutrition; >5 to ≤7, moderate malnutrition; >7 to ≤10, severe malnutrition, and >10, extreme malnutrition. RESULTS: A total of 52 Spanish HD Units participated in the study enrolling 2,748 patients. Mean age of patients was 68.20 ± 14.24 years, 1,811 (65.9%) were men. Mean time on HD was 55.63 ± 63.25 months. Using an MIS cut-off point of 2 for malnutrition, 89% of patients were malnourished (MIS > 2). However, with a cut-off point of 5, more commonly described in the literature, the percentage of patients with malnutrition was reduced to 51.7%. Using this cut-off, we observed significant differences between patients with malnutrition and normo-nourished patients in biochemical parameters, age, Charlson Index, HD residual renal function, scheme, and vascular access (permanent catheter vs arteriovenous fistula). A multivariate regression analysis showed that age, sex, HD scheme, vascular access, residual renal function, and comorbidity index were predictive factors for malnutrition. We found that a high percentage of HD patients with malnutrition did not receive oral supplementation. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of malnutrition in HD patients in Spain, assessed using the MIS scale, was high. Higher malnutrition was associated with the use of catheter versus fistula, and standard HD versus online hemodiafiltration, and with the absence of residual renal function, older age, greater comorbidity, and male sex. Malnourished patients had a low rate of oral supplementation.

Dynamic assessment of interleukin-6 during hemodialysis and mortality in coronavirus disease-19.

The impact of the newly discovered severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 causing coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) in hemodialysis patients remains poorly characterized. Some hemodialysis techniques reduce systemic inflammation but their impact on COVID-19 has not been addressed. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate factors associated with mortality in COVID-19 hemodialysis patients, including the impact of reducing interleukin-6 using a cytokine adsorbent filter. This is a prospective single-center study including 16 hemodialysis patients with COVID-19. All were dialyzed using a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) filter. Interleukin-6 levels were obtained before and after the first admission hemodialysis session and at 1 week. Baseline comorbidities, laboratory values, chest X-ray, and treatments were recorded and compared between survivors and non-survivors. Out of 16 patients (13 males, mean age 72 ± 15 years), 4 (25%) died. Factors associated with mortality were dialysis vintage (P = 0.01), chest X-ray infiltrates (P = 0.032), serum C-reactive protein (P = 0.05), and lactate dehydrogenase (P = 0.02) at 1 week, oxygen therapy requirement (P = 0.02) and anticoagulation (P < 0.01). At admission, non-survivors had higher predialysis and postdialysis interleukin-6 levels (P = 0.02 for both) and did not present the reduction of interleukin-6 levels during the dialysis session with PMMA filter that was observed in survivors (survivors vs. non-survivors: 25.0 [17.5-53.2]% vs. -2.8 [-109.4-12.8]% reduction, P = 0.04). A positive balance of interleukin-6 during the admission dialysis was associated with mortality (P = 0.008). In conclusion, in hemodialysis COVID-19 patients, a positive interleukin-6 balance during the admission hemodialysis session was associated with higher mortality.

Sacubitril/valsartan in chronic kidney disease, the nephrologist point of view. / Experiencia clínica con sacubitrilo/valsartán en pacientes con insuficiencia renal: la visión del nefrólogo.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sacubitril/valsartan reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with systolic dysfunction. The aim of the present study was to assess the evolution of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients after initiating sacubitril/valsartan. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included 66 consecutive CKD patients with systolic dysfunction followed up in outpatient care. Patients had to meet the inclusion criteria of having a New York Heart Association class ii to iv, receiving maximum tolerated doses of optimal medical therapy and CKD stages 1 to 4. At baseline, comorbidities and epidemiological data were collected and low doses of sacubitril/valsartan were initiated. At month 1 and 3, doses of sacubitril/valsartan were increased up to the maximum doses if tolerated. In each visit, renal function and cardiac biomarkers were recorded. All the data were analyzed at the end of follow up (6 months). RESULTS: Of the 66 patients, 42 (63%) were men, with a mean age of 73±15 years. Mean creatinine at baseline was 1.42±0.5 mg/dL (glomerular filtration rate estimated by CKD-EPI was 50±19 mL/min/1.73 m2) and mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 31±9%. At the end of follow up, LVEF improved from 31±9% to 39±15% (P <0.001). After one month of treatment, renal function improved up to 53±21 mL/min/1.73 m2, P=0.005. For the remaining follow-up time, glomerular filtration rate remained stable (mean at end of follow-up 51±18 mL/min/1.73 m2). Seven patients (10.6%) withdrew from treatment. CONCLUSION: In our experience, sacubitril/valsartan is safe in CKD, offering stability in CKD progression after 6 months.